With the
daily news reporting ever increasing mass surveillance and data collection by
alphabet soup agencies it is not surprising that many online users are
interested in considering alternative modes of connectedness and communication
while retaining the utility and convenience of a much beloved internet.
Darknets (a hidden but very real parallel internet), when used in socially
acceptable ways, are suggested by some as a means of avoiding the “spynet” (aka
regular internet). The idea is that rather than relegating the vast anonymous cyberspace
of darknets as synonymous for a haven of miscreants, and until more data protection
and privacy promoting laws are enacted, people may at least in part decide to
develop a community presence or otherwise utilize the net (e.g. personal web searches) in more securely encrypted and anonymized
settings. This can also be used to encourage anything from a peer-to-peer early
internet community feel to setting up a Tor service to allow a safe and secure
venue for whistleblowers to reveal misdeeds of their employers without threat
of retaliatory measures, as news agencies such as The New Yorker has done. It is interesting seeing these active
processes that can be taken to maintain privacy, although the fact that Darknet
is also being used for nefarious ways (e.g. drug dealings, pedophilia, etc) raises the tensions of where to maintain
the balance between privacy and surveillance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.